Legal Opinion
United States v. Edward Luce, Robert Kolofer, and James Luigs
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 9, 1983No. 82-5326, 82-5338 and 82-5377PublishedCited by 126 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CORNELIA G. KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.
Defendants Luce, Kolofer, and Luigs appeal from their jury convictions for possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute (21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1)). Luce and Luigs also appeal their convictions for conspiracy to possess a controlled substance with intent to distribute (21 U.S.C. § 846). The defendants raise numerous evidentiary issues. For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that none of the District Court’s rulings require reversal and affirm the convictions.
I
Before trial, defendant Luce moved in limine to prohibit the government from…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Brooks v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- New Jersey v. PortashSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Otha Lee MahoneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Anthony Provenzano, Stephen Andretta, and Thomas AndrettaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Charles Vinson, United States of America v. Arlie B. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by126 opinions
- Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Leonard Joseph YannottCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Gjon N. Nivica, United States of America v. Mark L. Pedley, A/K/A Jack Williams, Mark WellingtonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Harry Christian (84-5843), Joe L. Davis (85-5005/85-5346)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. James Pedroza, Francisco C. Pelaes, Jose Perez, and Enrique Jesus OsornoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.