Legal Opinion

Daniell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 24, 1993No. 267-91PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

MALONEY, Judge.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of delivery of less than four ounces but more than one-fourth of an ounce of marijuana. The jury assessed punishment at two years in the Texas Department of Corrections and a $2000 fine. The conviction was affirmed by the Tenth Court of Appeals in an unpublished opinion. Daniell v. State, No. 10-90-012-CR (Tex.App.—Waco, Nov. 29, 1990). We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to determine “whether the trial court erred in its response to [a] note from the jury during its…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. McGowan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  3. Allaben v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
  4. Haliburton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Earnhart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Matthew Ryan Wilson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2012
  2. Alonzo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  3. Villarreal v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
  4. Dixon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2001
  5. Brooks v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API