Daniell v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
MALONEY, Judge.
Appellant was convicted by a jury of delivery of less than four ounces but more than one-fourth of an ounce of marijuana. The jury assessed punishment at two years in the Texas Department of Corrections and a $2000 fine. The conviction was affirmed by the Tenth Court of Appeals in an unpublished opinion. Daniell v. State, No. 10-90-012-CR (Tex.App.—Waco, Nov. 29, 1990). We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to determine “whether the trial court erred in its response to [a] note from the jury during its…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- McGowan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Allaben v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Haliburton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Earnhart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Matthew Ryan Wilson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2012
- Alonzo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- Villarreal v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
- Dixon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2001
- Brooks v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.