Legal Opinion
Jonas v. Citibank, N.A.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 8, 2006No. 02 Civ.0497 RWSPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Citibank, N.A. (“Citibank”) has moved pursuant to Rules 12(b)(5), 12(b)(6), and in the alternative, 56, Fed. R. Civ. P., to dismiss the amended complaint of plaintiff pro se Gordon Jonas (“Jonas”) seeking damages for Citibank’s compliance with a writ of execution and transfer of social security funds in his Citibank account. Jonas has cross-moved for summary judgment and default judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the Citibank motion is granted, and the motions of Jonas are denied.
This action is a paradigm of the problems created in pro se…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Sikhs for Justice v. NathDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Cruz v. TD Bank, N.A., Martinez v. Capital One Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Richard v. DigneanDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2015
- Tann v. FisherDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- McCarthy v. Wachovia Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.