Legal Opinion

Peterson v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided November 13, 2013No. 222, 2013PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLAND, Justice:

The defendant-appellant, Kalvin Peterson (“Peterson”), appeals from a Superior Court judgment, following a bench trial, convicting him of one count of Possession of a Firearm by a Person Prohibited (“PFBPP”). Peterson’s sole claim of error is that collateral estoppel and double jeop*1245ardy bar his conviction. Peterson argues that the bench trial conviction was precluded because at a concurrent trial, a jury acquitted him of both Possession of a Firearm During the Commission of a Felony (“PFDCF”), and the underlying felony of Assault in the First Degree.

We have concluded that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Dowling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Lecates v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  4. Sierra v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  5. Donald v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. Independent Disposal ServiceSuperior Court of Delaware · 2017
  2. State v. BarrettSuperior Court of Delaware · 2016
  3. Waters v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API