Peterson v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLAND, Justice:
The defendant-appellant, Kalvin Peterson (“Peterson”), appeals from a Superior Court judgment, following a bench trial, convicting him of one count of Possession of a Firearm by a Person Prohibited (“PFBPP”). Peterson’s sole claim of error is that collateral estoppel and double jeop*1245ardy bar his conviction. Peterson argues that the bench trial conviction was precluded because at a concurrent trial, a jury acquitted him of both Possession of a Firearm During the Commission of a Felony (“PFDCF”), and the underlying felony of Assault in the First Degree.
We have concluded that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Dowling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Lecates v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
- Sierra v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
- Donald v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hamilton v. Independent Disposal ServiceSuperior Court of Delaware · 2017
- State v. BarrettSuperior Court of Delaware · 2016
- Waters v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2019