Legal Opinion

Donald v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided June 27, 2006No. 256, 2005PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIDGELY, Justice.

Defendant-Appellant Shaun S. Donald appeals the Superior Court’s denial of her motion to suppress evidence. She was convicted of maintaining a dwelling for keeping controlled substances, conspiracy second degree, possession of drug paraphernalia, and possession of a non-narcotic schedule I controlled substance. 1 On appeal, Donald challenges the reasonableness of an administrative search of the residence she shared with Terrance Harrison, who was on probation.

We conclude that the administrative search did not violate Donald’s rights under the Fourth Amendment of the U.S.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. United States v. KnightsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Georgia v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Jenkins v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Lopez-Vazquez v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  2. Sierra v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  3. Culver v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  4. Turner v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  5. Rivera v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API