Broadbent v. Hegge
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.
This appeal asks a single question about a single statute that has been interpreted in a single prior decision of this court.
The statute: Sec. 19.03, Stats., providing that: “(1) Every person commencing an action against any officer and his sureties upon his official bond, . . . shall give security for costs by an undertaking as prescribed in s. 271.28 (3) or 307.09, respectively, and a copy thereof shall be served upon the defendants at the time of the service of the summons. . . .” (It is undisputed that the plaintiff here did not file an undertaking for costs and did not serve a copy of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Kenosha v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Galloway v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Attoe v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Fehrenbach v. FehrenbachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Sheldon v. Nick & Sons, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
- Hamilton v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Lees v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Elm Park Iowa, Inc. v. DennistonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Becker v. Crispell-Snyder, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.