Legal Opinion

Broadbent v. Hegge

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1969No. 159PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.

This appeal asks a single question about a single statute that has been interpreted in a single prior decision of this court.

The statute: Sec. 19.03, Stats., providing that: “(1) Every person commencing an action against any officer and his sureties upon his official bond, . . . shall give security for costs by an undertaking as prescribed in s. 271.28 (3) or 307.09, respectively, and a copy thereof shall be served upon the defendants at the time of the service of the summons. . . .” (It is undisputed that the plaintiff here did not file an undertaking for costs and did not serve a copy of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Kenosha v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Galloway v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Attoe v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Fehrenbach v. FehrenbachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Sheldon v. Nick & Sons, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1948

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  2. Hamilton v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Lees v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Elm Park Iowa, Inc. v. DennistonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Becker v. Crispell-Snyder, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API