Hayden v. Town of Aurora
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to the Court of Appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey
The Town of Fletcher, now Aurora, on July 1st, 1901, issued its 150 bonds for $1,000 each, for the purchase of a water works. The ordinance pursuant to which these bonds were issued was numbered 10. This suit is to recover upon forty one of them. The only defense upon which proof was offered, or upon which reliance is had by the town in the present record, is that the ordinance in question was never published in a newspaper as required by law, or at all, and is therefore of no validity. To the defense the plaintiff, claiming to be a holder for value before maturity without knowledge or notice…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Waite v. Santa CruzSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Town of Coloma v. EavesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Sioux City Terminal Railroad & Warehouse Co. v. Trust Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
- Tulare Irrigation District v. ShepardSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Evansville v. DennettSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Divide Creek Irr. Dist. v. HollingsworthCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- Grater v. Logan High School DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
- Edmunds v. City of GlasgowMontana Supreme Court · 1931
- Carter v. Badger Irrigation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
- Interstate Trust Co. v. SteeleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.