Legal Opinion

Estate of Watkins v. Hedman, Hileman & Lacosta

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 2004No. 02-140PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

¶1 The Estate of Carolyn Watkins (the Estate) brought a legal malpractice action in the District Court for the Fourth Judicial District, Missoula County, to recover damages allegedly sustained as a result of attorney Susan Lacosta’s negligence in drafting a will and trust for Carolyn and her husband. The District Court granted Respondent’s motion for summary judgment concluding that the Estate’s action was time-barred under the three-year statue of limitations for legal malpractice. The Estate appeals. We reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this Opinion.

¶2 We address…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Sacco v. High Country Independent Press, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Stutzman v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Stockton v. FordSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  4. Greene v. Morgan, Theeler, Cogley & PetersenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Kullick v. Skyline Homeowners Ass'n, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Lorang v. Fortis InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Baltrusch v. BaltruschMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Stanley L. and Carolyn M. Watkins Trust v. LacostaMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Textana, Inc. v. Klabzuba Oil & GasMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Xu v. McLaughlin Research Institute for Biomedical Science, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API