Estate of Watkins v. Hedman, Hileman & Lacosta
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson
¶1 The Estate of Carolyn Watkins (the Estate) brought a legal malpractice action in the District Court for the Fourth Judicial District, Missoula County, to recover damages allegedly sustained as a result of attorney Susan Lacosta’s negligence in drafting a will and trust for Carolyn and her husband. The District Court granted Respondent’s motion for summary judgment concluding that the Estate’s action was time-barred under the three-year statue of limitations for legal malpractice. The Estate appeals. We reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this Opinion.
¶2 We address…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Sacco v. High Country Independent Press, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1995
- Stutzman v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaMontana Supreme Court · 1997
- Stockton v. FordSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Greene v. Morgan, Theeler, Cogley & PetersenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Kullick v. Skyline Homeowners Ass'n, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Lorang v. Fortis InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- Baltrusch v. BaltruschMontana Supreme Court · 2006
- Stanley L. and Carolyn M. Watkins Trust v. LacostaMontana Supreme Court · 2004
- Textana, Inc. v. Klabzuba Oil & GasMontana Supreme Court · 2009
- Xu v. McLaughlin Research Institute for Biomedical Science, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.