Legal Opinion

State v. Armstrong

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 3, 1980No. 51072PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHERAN, Chief Justice.

This is a pretrial appeal by the state, pursuant to R. 29.03, subd. 1, R.Crim.P., from an order of the district court suppressing evidence in a criminal prosecution. The issue raised by the state is whether the district court erred in concluding that the police violated defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights in obtaining the evidence in question. We remand for rehearing.

The district court concluded that defendant’s custodial arrest for the petty misde meanor of possessing a small amount of marijuana was illegal and that under State v. Martin, 253 N.W.2d 404 (Minn.1977), the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. State v. WicklundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. City of St. Paul v. MoodySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. State v. SchultzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. Joon Kyu KimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. State v. SchinzingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. State v. VeigelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. State v. Joon Kyu KimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API