Sub-Zero Freezer Co. v. R.J. Clarkson Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
TOAL, Justice:
Appellant (“Clarkson”) appeals the Circuit Court’s order dismissing its counterclaims to a Wisconsin judgment as barred by res judicata and entering the Wisconsin judgment in South Carolina. We affirm.
FACTS
Prior to 1988, Clarkson, a South Carolina company, was a distributor of Sub-Zero products. Sub-Zero is a Wisconsin corporation. Clarkson sued Sub-Zero in Circuit Court in 1988 for claims arising out of the distributorship. Sub-Zero removed the case to federal district court. Thereafter, the parties entered into a settlement agreement. In the settlement agreement, Clarkson…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Juneau Square Corp. v. First Wisconsin National Bank of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
- Collins Ex Rel. Quality Processing, Inc. v. SigmonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
- Jaynes v. County of FairfieldCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991
- Sub-Zero Freezer Co. v. R.J. Clarkson Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
- W. T. Furguson Lumber Co. v. ElliottSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Plum Creek Development Co. v. City of ConwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Charleston Lumber Co. v. Miller Housing Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- REIDMAN CORP. v. Greenville Steel Structures, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- Johnson v. Greenwood Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Doe Ex Rel. Roe v. Orangeburg County School District No. 2Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.