Legal Opinion

Sub-Zero Freezer Co. v. R.J. Clarkson Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 13, 1992No. 23634PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TOAL, Justice:

Appellant (“Clarkson”) appeals the Circuit Court’s order dismissing its counterclaims to a Wisconsin judgment as barred by res judicata and entering the Wisconsin judgment in South Carolina. We affirm.

FACTS

Prior to 1988, Clarkson, a South Carolina company, was a distributor of Sub-Zero products. Sub-Zero is a Wisconsin corporation. Clarkson sued Sub-Zero in Circuit Court in 1988 for claims arising out of the distributorship. Sub-Zero removed the case to federal district court. Thereafter, the parties entered into a settlement agreement. In the settlement agreement, Clarkson…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Juneau Square Corp. v. First Wisconsin National Bank of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
  2. Collins Ex Rel. Quality Processing, Inc. v. SigmonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  3. Jaynes v. County of FairfieldCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991
  4. Sub-Zero Freezer Co. v. R.J. Clarkson Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
  5. W. T. Furguson Lumber Co. v. ElliottSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Plum Creek Development Co. v. City of ConwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Charleston Lumber Co. v. Miller Housing Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. REIDMAN CORP. v. Greenville Steel Structures, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  4. Johnson v. Greenwood Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  5. Doe Ex Rel. Roe v. Orangeburg County School District No. 2Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API