Legal Opinion

Jaynes v. County of Fairfield

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided January 7, 1991No. 1589PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gardner, Judge:

John R. Jaynes and Patricia M. Jaynes (the Jaynes) brought this action against the County of Fairfield asserting, inter alia, a cause of action for inverse condemnation. Both parties moved for summary judgment. The appealed order granted summary judgment in favor of the county. We affirm.

ISSUE

The only issue of merit is whether the trial judge erred in holding that the Jaynes are barred by the doctrine of res judi-cata.

FACTS

The Jaynes own a farm in Fairfield County which has a road running through part of it. The issue of this case is whether the part of the road running through…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. North Carolina Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. DAV Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  2. Jimmy Martin Realty Group, Inc. v. Fameco Distributors, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sub-Zero Freezer Co. v. R.J. Clarkson Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  2. Briggs v. Newberry County School DistrictDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1992
  3. Stokes v. VierraDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1995
  4. Plum Creek Development Co. v. City of ConwayCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  5. Encore Technology Group, LLC v. Keone Trask & Clear TouchCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API