Legal Opinion
Jacobs v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 7, 1984PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Anthony J. Ferraro, J.
In an action for damages based on defendant’s alleged violation of the Truth in Lending Act (US Code, tit 15, § 1601 etseq.), defendant moves to dismiss the complaint as failing to state a cause of action (CPLR 3211, subd [a], par 7). Since issue has been joined, the motion is deemed one for summary judgment. (See Smith v Russell Sage Coll., 54 NY2d 185, 191.)
The sole issue on this motion is whether section 1666 of title 15 of the United States Code is applicable to any extension of consumer credit or only to open-end consumer credit plans (US Code,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Helvering v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Smith v. Russell Sage CollegeNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. Mobil Oil Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Eaton v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- American Express Co. v. KoernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Broadway National Bank v. Barton-Russell Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1992
- Crestar Bank, N.A. v. CheeversDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Bailey v. Capitol Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Costco Wholesale Corp. v. RendinaNew York District Court · 2012