Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Capitol Motors, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 27, 1986No. 145PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODOWSKY, Judge.

In this appeal we hold that the federal Fair Credit Billing Act (FCBA) does not apply to a transaction under a typical Maryland retail installment sale agreement.

On July 30, 1981, appellant, Jerry Bailey, and his daughter, Pamela Bailey, purchased, on credit, a used automobile from Capitol Motors, Inc. The original terms of the sale are evidenced by a retail installment sale agreement under which the finance charge, stated as a sum in dollars, was added to the unpaid balance to arrive at the total of payments which the buyers promised to pay in thirty monthly installments, at…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mourning v. Family Publications Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. MilhollinSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Anderson Bros. Ford v. ValenciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. American Express Co. v. KoernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Jacobs v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.New York Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Grainger v. Brock & Scott PLLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023
  2. Ruiz v. Rocket MortgageDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API