Legal Opinion
Rother v. Hiniker
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 25, 1940No. 32,324PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hilton, Justice.
This is an action by Leo Hiniker against the Rothers, tried upon a counterclaim, for damages arising from fraud in the sale of certain real and personal property. Twice verdicts have been for Hiniker. The Rothers now seek a reversal of an order denying their motion for judgment notwithstanding or a new trial.
On November 8, 1937, Hiniker saw this advertisement in a St. Paul newspaper:
“On account of old age we are forced to sell our beautiful 200 acre black loam farm. Eqpt. with 23 head stock, 15 cows freshening, 5 horses, 18 hogs, poultry. All grain and seed, full silo,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Meland v. YoungbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Roseberry v. Hart-Parr Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Perkins v. MeyertonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Schmidt v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Old Colony Life Insurance v. MoegleinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Berryman v. RiegertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Jensen v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Hafner v. RitzingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- City of Coon Rapids v. Suburban Engineering, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Trautwein v. BozzoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.