Legal Opinion
In Re Kasper
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided September 7, 1982No. 85-81PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
On April 1, 1980, the appellant filed a petition for post-conviction relief under 13 V.S.A. § 7131. The basis of his claim was that his trial attorney did not provide effective assistance of counsel, thereby abridging his rights under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and under article ten of chapter one of the Vermont Constitution. This is an appeal from the decision of the Chittenden Superior Court denying the petition for relief. We affirm.
We will review the relevant facts of this case in the context of the appellant’s specific allegations of counsel…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re MecierSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
- In Re PernickaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
- In Re StevensSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
- State v. McGuiganSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- Town of Pawlet v. Daniel BanyaiSupreme Court of Vermont · 2024
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.