Sutter v. Sims
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BILLINGS, Chief Judge.
The trial court denied plaintiffs’ petition for a private way of necessity across defendants’ property under § 228.340, RSMo 1969. We reverse and remand with directions to enter judgment for plaintiffs.
Initially, we note that our review of this court tried case is governed by Rule 73.01, V.A.M.R., as interpreted by Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976). That decision tells us we are to sustain the judgment of the lower court “. unless there is no substantial evidence to support it, unless it is against the weight of the evidence, unless it erroneously declares…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Vossen v. DautelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- Hill v. Kennoy, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1975
- Moravek v. OcsodyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
- Evans v. MansfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Short v. Southern Union Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- Lewis v. HilkerbaumerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- King v. Jack Cooper Transport Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- Crouse v. BurkemperMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- Reid v. JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.