Legal Opinion

Employers National Insurance v. Grantors to Diaz Refinery PRP Committee Site Trust

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 28, 1993No. 92-494PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gary D. Corum, Special Justice.

This appeal is brought by Employers National Insurance Company (“Employers”) and Ranger Insurance Company (“Ranger”) from the chancellor’s denial of their motions to intervene in the chancery court lawsuit between the Grantors to the Diaz Refinery PRP Committee Site Trust (“PRP Committee”) and Diaz Refinery, Inc. (“Diaz”). The chancery court denied intervention on the basis that the motions were not timely. We find no abuse of discretion in this ruling, and thus affirm.

Employers and Ranger are insurance companies which issued liability policies to Diaz for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Looper v. Madison Guaranty Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  2. Cupples Farms Partnership v. Forrest City Production Credit Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Bank of Quitman v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
  4. Polnac-Hartman & Associates v. First National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Milberg, Weiss, Bershad, Hynes, & Lerach, LLP v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Ingram v. WirtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Ballard v. GarrettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Bradford v. BradfordCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Lowell v. LowellCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API