Legal Opinion

Bradford v. Bradford

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided February 21, 1996No. CA 94-1313PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John Mauzy Pittman, Judge.

Katie Bradford has appealed from an order of the Van Burén County Chancery Court allowing her son, appellee, Darrell Bradford, to intervene in his parents’ divorce action. In this order, the chancellor granted appellee specific performance of an oral contract whereby his parents agreed to convey a parcel of real property to him. On appeal, appellant argues that the chancellor erred in allowing appellee to intervene in the divorce case and in granting specific performance of the agreement. We affirm the chancellor’s decision in all respects.

In 1992, appellant and her…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Bachus v. BachusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  2. Billabong Products, Inc. v. Orange City BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  3. Carton v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  4. UHS of Arkansas, Inc. v. City of SherwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  5. Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. BassSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  2. Lee v. Hot Springs Village Golf SchoolsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Pearson v. First National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Winn v. BondsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
  5. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. BassSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API