Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Zoller

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 29, 1985No. Nos. 26 and 62 W.D. Appeal Dkt. 1984PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIX, Chief Justice.

We are here called upon to consider the broad question as to the applicability of the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment, made applicable to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment,1 upon a trial court order granting a defendant’s motion to terminate the trial in his favor before verdict. Specifically, the issue raised is whether our procedure which permits a trial court’s order sustaining a demurrer to the Commonwealth’s evidence to be reversed upon appeal, allows a new trial where the order was erroneously entered. For the reasons that follow we are…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Smalis v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Commonwealth v. BuehlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. United States v. John Gilbert Ogles, United States of America v. John Gilbert OglesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. Commonwealth v. GoldhammerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Commonwealth v. MicklosSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API