Legal Opinion
Dugas v. Beauregard
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 21, 1967PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCovello, J.
The plaintiffs are resident taxpayers of the city of Norwich. In this action they seek a declaratory judgment determining the validity of an amendment to the city charter adopted on March 16, 1965, and injunctive relief. The court determined that the amendment to the charter was validly adopted and rendered judgment for the defendants. The plaintiffs have appealed to this court.
The city of Norwich as presently constituted was established as a municipal corporation by No. 573 of the 1951 Special Acts (26 Spec. Laws 459, No. 573), of which we take judicial notice. The provi sions of this act…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chamberlain v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
- Sachem's Head Property Owners' Ass'n v. Town of GuilfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Davis Holding Corporation v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- State Ex Rel. Malkin v. McMahonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
3Cited by19 opinions
- Dotts v. Taressa J.A.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
- McClanahan v. Cochise CollegeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- Caulfield v. NobleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Kucera v. City of WheelingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1969
- FLOOD CONTROL DIST. OF MARICOPA CTY. v. ConlinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.