Legal Opinion

Yoshisato v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1992No. S022929PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LUCAS, C. J.

In the June 1990 Primary Election, the voters approved two measures (Propositions 114 and 115), both of which amended Penal Code section 190.2 (hereafter section 190.2). Proposition 114 received more votes than Proposition 115, and is clearly operative. We granted review to decide whether, and to what extent, the amendments made to section 190.2 by Proposition 115 should be given effect. (See Cal. Const., art. II, § 10, subd. (b).) We conclude that all of the substantive amendments made to section 190.2 by Proposition 115 are effective.

I. Facts and Procedure

Petitioner…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Raven v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Brosnahan v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Taxpayers to Limit Campaign Spending v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. In Re HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. People v. CovarrubiasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  3. People v. ClevelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Sherwin-Williams Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. People v. Romero and SelfCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API