Legal Opinion

State v. Mateyko

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 2001PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · BarkerWilliam M. Barker, J.

in which E. RILEY ANDERSON, C.J., and FRANK F. DROWOTA, III, ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR., and JANICE M. HOLDER, JJ., joined.

The defendant was charged and convicted of child abuse through neglect in violation of Tennessee Code Annotated section 39-15-401(a). The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed the conviction, finding that the State did not establish that the defendant’s children suffered any actual, deleterious effect or harm from the neglect. However, the intermediate court found that the defendant was guilty of attempted child abuse through neglect, and it remanded the case for…

3Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wyatt v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. DuckerTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. DentonTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Lavin v. JordonTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. MallardTennessee Supreme Court · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. DorantesTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. HansonTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. ShermanTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  4. United States v. ArmsteadCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  5. State v. ToliverTennessee Supreme Court · 2003

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API