Legal Opinion

State v. Worm

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 2004No. S-02-1506PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

James R. Worm appeals his sentence for attempted first degree sexual assault on a child and the district court’s finding that he was subject to the amended provisions of Nebraska’s Sex Offender Registration Act (Act), Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-4001 to 29-4013 (Cum. Supp. 2002). The court determined that Worm had committed an aggravated offense under an amendment that was not a part of the Act when the offense occurred. Worm contends that the court’s finding violated the ex post facto clause arid that he was denied procedural due process. We affirm.

II. BACKGROUND

In April 2002, the…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. BocheNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. SchreinerNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. VelaNebraska Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Sidney Lamour Tyson v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State v. VanNebraska Supreme Court · 2004

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API