Legal Opinion

In re Estate of Pacheco

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1865PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Probate Court, Santa Clara County. The notice of appeal stated that an appeal was taken from the order of the Probate Court made September 3d, 1864, denying the petition of Penniman and others for the removal of Emeric, and refusing to appoint Penniman, and from all orders and decisions made by the Court in that behalf on that day. The other facts are stated in the opinion of the Court, and in 23 Cal. 476.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Currey, J.

The proceedings with which this case stands immediately connected may be found detailed in the case of the same title reported in 23 Cal. 476.

Upon filing in the Probate Court the remittitur of the Supreme Court in the case reported as above, on the 17th of August, 1864, the Probate Court made an order revoking the letters of administration before then granted to Joseph Emeric, and directing him to account, and by the same order appointed H. P. Penniman, administrator of the estate of said Pacheco, deceased, with the will annexed, to whom it was directed that letters of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Estate of PachecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Phœnix Water Co. v. FletcherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dodge v. GaylordIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Estate of KeaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  4. In re Dewar's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API