Black & Decker Manufacturing Co. v. Disston, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOHN L. MILLER, District Judge.
This patent infringement suit brought by the Black and Decker Manufacturing Company against Disston, Inc. principally involves the manufacture and sale of cordless electric hedge trimmers. Black and Decker claims that Disston is guilty of infringing its Patent No. 3,757,194 issued on September 4,1973. The thrust of Disston’s defense is that the subject patent is invalid for obviousness. At the outset we note that this case, by patent litigation standards, is not that complicated. That factor we believe will facilitate the understanding of our approach to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Anderson's-Black Rock, Inc. v. Pavement Salvage Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Sakraida v. Ag Pro, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Universal Athletic Sales Co., a Corporation v. American Gym, Recreational & Athletic Equipment Corporation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- LD Schreiber Cheese Co., Inc. v. Clearfield Cheese Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- Crucible, Inc. v. Stora Kopparbergs Bergslags ABDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1984