State v. Bruun
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
ORME, Judge:
*758 ¶1 This case presents the question of whether a civil settlement between a victim and a defendant, entered into prior to entry of an order of complete restitution in a related criminal case, precludes the victim from enforcing that restitution order once it is entered as a judgment on the civil docket. In light of the plain language of, and the well-recognized purposes for, the Crime Victims Restitution Act, we conclude that a prior civil settlement does not preclude enforcement of a restitution judgment provided that the victim does not obtain a double recovery.
BACKGROUND
¶2…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. DanielsUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. OgdenUtah Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. LaycockUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- Cox v. LaycockUtah Supreme Court · 2015
- Ortega v. Ridgewood Estates LLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. Diderickson and BruunUtah Supreme Court · 2022