Legal Opinion

Vidal v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 30, 1968No. 1 CA-IC 162PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEVENS, Judge.

This claim is before us for the second time and must again be resolved based upon procedural errors. Our first consideration of the claim culminated in the opinion reported as Vidal v. Industrial Commission, 3 Ariz.App. 529, 416 P.2d 208 (1966). The 1966 opinion contains a careful review of the procedures before the Commission, a review which will not be repeated in this opinion.

A brief statement as to the background is appropriate. Vidal was injured on 19 July 1960. The matter was brought before the Commission in a timely manner, the claim was administratively processed and,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. King v. Alabam's Freight Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Schnatzmeyer v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Harbel Oil Co. v. Superior Court of Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Salmi v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  5. Denver & Rio Grande Western R. Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lugar v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  2. Rutledge v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  3. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  4. Hazelton v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  5. Chavez v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API