Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Industrial Commission

OPINION

EUBANK, Judge.

This third review of an Industrial Commission award requires a determination of whether the factual deficiencies noted in Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. v. Industrial Commission, 14 Ariz.App. 21, 480 P.2d 358 (1971), and in Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. v. Industrial Commission, 20 Ariz.App. 587, 514 P.2d 758 (1973) have been cured by a hearing, held subsequent to the issuance of our last mandate.

The facts are set out in detail in our first opinion and need not be repeated here, except to say that Mrs. Mary Fuller was employed by the petitioner, Montgomery Ward, in June 1965…