Agricultural Ditch Co. v. Rollins
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from the District Court of the City and County of Denver. Hon. Peter L. Palmer, Judge.' Mandamus by Robert P. Rollins against the Agricultural Ditch Company, a corporation, Charles Hallaclc and Henry Lee, to compel respondents to transfer certain of the company’s capital stock to relator, and to deliver to him during that irrigation season a quantity of water. From a judgment awarding the peremptory writ, respondents appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell
The appellee, Robert P. Rollins, as petitioner, sought by writ of mandamus to' compel the respondent ditch company and its officers to transfer upon its books four shares of its capital stock, which he had acquired by purchase, and to deliver to him during the irrigation season of 1903 the quantity of water to which these shares of stock in the company entitled their owner. From a judgment awarding the peremptory writ, the respondents appealed.
The alternative writ states that the respondent ditch company is a mutual benefit company, organized under the laws of this state solely for the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wheeler v. Northern Colorado Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1887
- Combs v. Agricultural Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1892
- Townsend v. Fulton Irrigating Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1891
- Butterfly-Terrible Gold Mining Co. v. BrindSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lamm v. BarberSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
- Northern Colorado Irrigation Co. v. PouppirtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
- City v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
- Arnold v. CareySupreme Court of Colorado · 1915
- Lamm v. BarberSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.