Legal Opinion

State v. Martinez

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 4, 2002No. 1 CA-CR 01-0350PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARKER, Judge.

¶ 1 We consider in this case the affirmative defense of justification for the use of deadly force in crime prevention and how it is affected by the legislative changes to the burden of proof. Ariz.Rev.Stat. (“A.R.S.”) §§ 13-411 and 13-205 (2001).

I

¶ 2 Antonio Sanchez Martinez (“defendant”) and a co-worker, Ledesma, drank some beer together at Ledesma’s home after work on September 6,2000. While at Ledesma’s home, defendant called his girlfriend and argued with her. After the call, the girlfriend telephoned the police and accused defendant of committing a crime.

¶ 3…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. RiggsArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. GrilzArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Englehart v. Jeep Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. FarleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Pinal County Mental Health No. Mh-201000029Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  2. State of Arizona v. Andy Daniel AlmeidaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  3. State v. JeffreyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  4. State of Arizona v. Scott Alan ColvinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  5. In Re Pinal County Mental Health No. Mh-201000029Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API