Legal Opinion

Patrick Hately v. Dr. David Watts

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided March 6, 2019No. 18-1306PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYNN, Circuit Judge:

Patrick Hately brought this action alleging that David Watts unlawfully accessed messages in Hately's web-based email account in violation of the Virginia Computer Crimes Act and the federal Stored Communications Act. But the district court found that Hately failed to demonstrate the requisite statutory injury under state law, and that Hately's previously opened and delivered emails stored by a web-based email service were not in statutorily protected "electronic storage" under federal law. We disagree with both determinations and therefore reverse and remand this case to…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Perrin Davis v. Facebook, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  2. Marie Laurent-Workman v. Christine WormuthCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
  3. Erika Bazemore v. Best BuyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
  4. MarketGraphics Research Grp. v. David BergeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  5. TKC Aerospace Inc. v. Muhs (In Re Muhs)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API