Legal Opinion
Chugach Electric Ass'n v. City of Anchorage
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided August 11, 1952No. A-7932PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOLTA, District Judge.
The plaintiff, a cooperative organized to obtain the benefits of the Rural Electrification Act of 1936, 7 U.S.C.A. § 901, et seq., is engaged in the generation, distribution and sale of electricity in the suburbs of the City of Anchorage. By this proceeding plaintiff challenges the City’s right to extend its transmission and distribution lines beyond its corporate limits, as well as those of the Eastchester Public Utility District, into territory which plaintiff serves or is prepared to serve under loans financed by the Rural Electrification Administration.
After the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. City of North Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- Booth v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- United States v. ChaplinUnited States Circuit Court · 1887
- Bayliss v. Mayor of North ArlingtonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
3Cited by2 opinions
- Chugach Electric Ass'n, Inc. v. City of AnchorageCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Chugach Electric Association v. City of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1967