Legal Opinion

United States v. Chaplin

United States Circuit Court

Decided August 29, 1887PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Action to Recover Damages for Gutting Timber on the Public Lauds.

1Opinion of the CourtDeady, J.

This action is brought by the United States to recover damages for cutting and removing timber from the public lauds. It is alleged in the complaint that on December 18, 1880, and on divers days between then and December 1, 1885, the defendant Daniel Chaplin unlawfully entered on sundry sections and subdivisions of sections of the public lands, being parts of townships 1, 2, and 8 N., of range 86 E., of townships 1 N. and 1 S., of range 85 E., of township 2 S., of range 86 E.,and of township 2 S., of range 37 E., and situate in the counties of Umatilla and Union, Oregon, and cut therefrom…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wolfe v. HurleyDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1930
  2. Stone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1894
  3. Moon v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Sun Lumber Co. v. Nelson Fuel Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Bacheldor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API