Legal Opinion

Sebring v. Quackenbush

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1923PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Taxpayer's action to restrain ofFteals of the city of Corning from removing the clock tower from Clock Tower square,

1Opinion of the CourtCunningham, J.

This action is brought by the plaintiff, as a taxpayer, to restrain the defendants from removing the clock tower from its present location in a public square of the city.

Market street is the principal street of the city of Corning and runs easterly and westerly; Pine street runs northerly and southerly *610to Market street. Them mm, public square extending northerly from the junction of Market and Pine streets to the* Chemung river. The tracks of the New York Central railroad cross this square at a point about two hundred feet north of Market street. The square is one hundred and twenty-five…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brooklyn Park Commissioners v. ArmstrongNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Williams v. . GallatinNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Porter v. . International Bridge Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
  4. Parsons v. WyckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  5. Curran v. GuilfoyleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Aldrich v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1955
  2. In re the Assessment of the Cost & Expense of the Improvement of Central ParkwayNew York Supreme Court · 1931
  3. 795 Fifth Avenue Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Rayor v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
  5. City of Schenectady v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API