Legal Opinion
City of Schenectady v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided April 29, 1957No. Claim No. 31186PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCharles T. Major, J.
The City of Schenectady filed this claim to recover for the value of park lands appropriated for purposes connected with the Mohawk Thruway, and directly pertaining to a spur line through Pleasant Valley Park to the center of the city of Schenectady, pursuant to article 12-A of the Highway Law. The land appropriated is described on Map No. 50 R-l as Parcel No. 55, and is located between Broadway on the westerly side and Hulett Street on the easterly side in the city of Schenectady. The spur line for which this appropriation was made, is beneficial and advantageous to the city.
The…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hunter v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Brooklyn Park Commissioners v. ArmstrongNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- The People v. . KerrNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
- Darlington v. . Mayor, C., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- Williams v. . GallatinNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Town of Peru v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1969
- City of New Rochelle v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1962
- City of Albany v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Village of Port Chester v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1965
- County of Warren v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1966