Shannon v. Tooker
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order refusing a new trial. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an action by the plaintiff to recover from the defendant, Tooker, certain shares of stock in the defendant company, which were sold to Tooker upon a sale for the collection of a delinquent assessment, alleged by the plaintiff to have been voidable because of a defect in the proceedings leading up to the sale. The judgment below was for the defendants. The plaintiff appeals from said judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
The assessment was made on September 12, 1907, and the resolution stated that it would become delinquent if not paid on or before October 16,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Smith v. Gate City Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wheatland v. MaloneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Lindsey v. McClureCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
- Cappuccio v. TuftsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Brown v. St. Paul Consolidated Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- McCallum v. MaxwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933