Legal Opinion

Goswick v. City of Durham

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 9, 1937PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.

The plaintiffs contend that it sufficiently appears from the figures and mathematical calculations contained in the exhibits offered, evidencing the fiscal affairs of the city of Durham as of 30 June, 1936, upon which the findings of fact and the judgment of the court were based, thai the funds used for the purchase of land for the municipal airport were derived in whole or in part from ad valorem taxes, and that therefore the purchase should be held invalid and the property required to be sold and the proceeds converted back into the city treasury for the benefit of the taxpayers in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dysart v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  2. Adams v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Walker v. Town of FaisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Aviation Services, Inc. v. Bd. of Adjustment of Hanover Tp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  2. Turner v. . ReidsvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. Airport Authority v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. Barrier v. TroutmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Burnham v. Mayor & Aldermen of BeverlyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API