Legal Opinion

State v. Ah Loo

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 2000No. 22467PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

LEVINSON, J.

The plaintiff-appellant-petitioner State of Hawai'i (“the prosecution”) has applied for a writ of certiorari to review the published opinion of the Intermediate Court of Appeals (ICA) in State v. Ah Loo, 94 Hawai'i 201, 9 P.3d 513 (Ct.App.2000) [hereinafter, “the ICA’s opinion”]. The ICA’s opinion affirmed the order of the district court of the fifth circuit, filed on April 14,1999, which granted the defendant-appellee-respondent Nathan Ah Loo’s motion to suppress a statement that he made to a police officer regarding his age.

We granted certiorari in order…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. State v. SantiagoHawaii Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State v. JenkinsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. JAVIER M.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Tri-S Corp. v. Western World Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Kahale v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. KetchumHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Child Support Enforcement Agency v. RoeHawaii Supreme Court · 2001

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API