Legal Opinion

People v. Randall

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 9, 1985No. 84SA235PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIRSHBAUM, Justice.

The defendant, William Randall, appeals his jury convictions on two counts of sexual assault on a child 1 and two counts of indecent exposure. 2 The defendant asserts that section 18-7-302, 8 C.R.S. (1978), violates the due process clauses of the United States and Colorado Constitutions. 3 He also contends that the trial court committed reversible error with respect to two rulings denying defense objections to the introduction of evidence and that the evidence does not support the indecent exposure convictions and one of the sexual assault on a child convictions. We affirm.

I

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Smith v. GoguenSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Stull v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  4. People v. LoweSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  5. People v. CastroSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Moll v. Abbott LaboratoriesMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. McCoy v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
  3. People v. CrossSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  4. United States v. WhittenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  5. Parrish v. LammSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API