Legal Opinion

Hipsher v. Hunter

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 21, 1950No. 183Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The judgment is affirmed upon the reasoning set forth in the opinion of the trial court, plus the further reasoning:

The part performance relied upon by the appellants to take this case out of the statute of frauds is the doing of ordinary farm work of such a character that it is not impossible nor impracticable to compensate in damages, the awarding of which will place the parties in status quo.

*279Under the rule of law hereinafter mentioned, the doing of such work does not constitute part performance sufficient to take the case out of the statute of frauds.

The rule above referred to,…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mossholder v. WigginsOhio Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Mossholder v. WigginsOhio Court of Appeals · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API