Legal Opinion

Jerry And Sally Mulder, V Cabinet Distributors, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 10, 2015No. 45667-2Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

FILED COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II 2015 FEB 10 % M 8: 59 ST TON BY_ IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHIN DIVISION II JERRY MULDER and SALLY MULDER, and No. 45667 -2 -II their marital community, Respondent, v. CABINET DISTRIBUTORS, INC., a UNPUBLISHED OPINION Washington corporation, Appellants. LEE, J. — Cabinet Distributors, Inc. ( CDI) appeals the trial court' s order awarding Jerry and Sally Mulder ( the Mulders) attorney fees. CDI argues that the contract for the purchase and installation of cabinets does not authorize attorney fees for the Mulders' claims. CDI also argues that…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Hearst Communications v. Seattle Times Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Hearst Communications, Inc. v. Seattle Times Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Riss v. AngelWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Riss v. AngelWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Phillips Building Co., Inc. v. AnCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API