Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Sioux Falls v. Kohler

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1962No. File 9944Published

1DissentBiegelmeier, J.

Lt. Renli in answer to a question that this was an on-the-spot test and did not purport to be a scientific portion, testified it was what they called only a "field test," to distinguish between a person who had "nothing *38to drink" and a person who had "something to drink." This is of the same tenor as the printed item on Ex. 3 headed "Some Key Points" which states as to the interpretation of Decolorization Time: "Remember this gives an approximate % only. The chemist will determine the exact % for evidence." (Emphasis supplied)

It was an early step only to determine if there was alcohol present…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1953
  2. Toms v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
  3. People v. BobczykAppellate Court of Illinois · 1951
  4. State v. MillerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  5. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1953

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API