City of Sioux Falls v. Kohler
South Dakota Supreme Court
1DissentBiegelmeier, J.
Lt. Renli in answer to a question that this was an on-the-spot test and did not purport to be a scientific portion, testified it was what they called only a "field test," to distinguish between a person who had "nothing *38to drink" and a person who had "something to drink." This is of the same tenor as the printed item on Ex. 3 headed "Some Key Points" which states as to the interpretation of Decolorization Time: "Remember this gives an approximate % only. The chemist will determine the exact % for evidence." (Emphasis supplied)
It was an early step only to determine if there was alcohol present…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1953
- Toms v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
- People v. BobczykAppellate Court of Illinois · 1951
- State v. MillerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1953
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.