Legal Opinion
Hastings v. Konick (In Re Konick)
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit
Decided July 14, 1999No. BAP MB 98-034PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
Mr. Konick, the Defendant/Appellant, challenges an order issued by the United States Bankruptcy Court finding that his property settlement obligations to Ms. Hastings, Plaintiff/Appellee, as a consequence of their Separation Agreement and subsequent divorce, are nondischargeable. We affirm the bankruptcy court’s judgment.
JURISDICTION
The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel has jurisdiction to review final decisions from the United States Bankruptcy Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(b)(1). See also Sanford Institution for Savings v. Gallo, 156 F.3d 71, 74 (1st Cir.1998). The bankruptcy court’s finding…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Palmacci v. UmpierrezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Jodoin v. Samayoa (In Re Jodoin)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Hart v. Molino (In Re Molino)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Dressler v. Dressler (In Re Dressler)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cowell v. Hale (In Re Hale)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2003
- Cameron v. Cameron (In Re Cameron)District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1999
- Pino v. Pino (In Re Pino)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 2001
- Tyndall v. Tyndall (In re Tyndall)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2007
- Garrity v. Hadley (In Re Hadley)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.