Legal Opinion

Southern Pac. Co. v. Corbett

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 10, 1937No. 4055-SPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

This case involves the question whether the necessary incidental storage of materials bought by an interstate railway company for installation in the service of repair and replacement, under a predetermined plan for the maintenance and improvement of the service, is a use in interstate commerce. The State of California, under a general tax law applying to all persons storing within the state goods purchased without the state, upon which goods no state sales tax has been paid, seeks to have included in the large number of persons subject to the statute those engaged in…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  3. Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Co. v. GallagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Southern Pac. Co. v. GallagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Nevada-California Electric Corporation v. CorbettDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1938
  4. Southern Pac. Co. v. CorbettDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1938
  5. Printers & Publishers Corp. v. CorbettDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API