Legal Opinion

Grove v. City of York, Penn.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 9, 2004No. CIV. l:CV-03-198PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

RAMBO, District Judge.

Before the court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. The parties have briefed the issues, and the matters are ripe for disposition.

I. Background

The instant case is a civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 wherein Plaintiffs allege that Defendants violated their First and Fourteenth Amendment rights of free speech, freedom of assembly, and free exercise of religion. The following facts are undisputed unless otherwise noted. 1 Plaintiffs are individuals who practice Christianity and…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Saint John's Church in the Wilderness v. ScottColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. PruskyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API