Legal Opinion
Juniper Networks, Inc. v. Shipley
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 29, 2011No. 2010-1327PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Chief Judge.
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted Peter M. Shipley’s (“Shipley’s”) motion to dismiss Juniper Networks, Inc.’s (“Juniper’s”) false marking qui tam action for failure to state a claim. Juniper Networks v. Shipley, No. 09-0696, 2010 WL 986809, at *10 (N.D.Cal. Mar. 17, 2010) (“Dismissal Order”). Because Juniper’s Amended Complaint does not reasonably allege an “unpatented article” within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 292, this court affirms.
I
Juniper makes and sells computer networking products to businesses, including a variety of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Kearns v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Ultramercial, Inc. v. Hulu, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Bot M8 LLC v. Sony Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- Sanderling Management Ltd. v. Snap Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023
- Ultramercial, Inc. v. Hulu, LlcCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Accent Packaging, Inc. v. Leggett & Platt, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.