Legal Opinion

Trenton Matthew Stamey v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 22, 2018No. A18A0730; A18A0731; A18A0732; A18A0733; A18A0734; A18A0735Published

1Opinion of the Court

Self, Judge.

In each of these appeals, we are called upon to address the same issue based upon identical facts: whether the trial court erred by denying appellants' motion to suppress grounded upon the State's failure to immediately present wiretap recordings for sealing as required by federal law. See 18 USC § 2518 (8) (a). For the reasons explained below, we affirm.

On appeal, we accept the findings of the trial court on questions of disputed fact unless those findings are clearly erroneous. We owe no deference, however, to the trial court on questions of law, and we must decide for ourselves

w…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Ojeda RiosSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. United States v. Salvatore A. Williams, A/K/A "Sonny." United States of America v. Salvatore C. Williams, A/K/A "Sal." United States of America v. Adolph Williams, A/K/A "Junior."Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. William ConeyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  4. Franklin v. EavesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  5. North v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API