Legal Opinion
United States v. William Coney
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 11, 2005No. 02-3361PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Circuit Judge.
The defendant was convicted by a jury of federal drug offenses and sentenced to 240 months in prison. The evidence that the government presented at trial included recordings of telephone calls intercepted pursuant to orders issued by the chief judge of the district court under Title III, the federal wiretap statute, 18 U.S.C. ch. 119. The contents of the intercept “shall, if possible” (it was possible here), “be recorded.” 18 U.S.C. § 2518(8)(a). “Immediately upon the expiration of the period [covered by the intercept order] ... such recordings shall be made available to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Alex Wong, Roger Kwok, Chen I. Chung, Tung Tran, Danny Ngo, Brian Chan, Joseph Wang, Chiang T. Cheng, and Steven NgCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Maldonado-RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Catawba Indian Tribe of South Carolina v. State of S.C.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Michael E. WyattCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. BansalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Burgos-MontesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Thomas B. McLaughlin and Christine McLaughlinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Gomez, RosemaryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- United States v. RodriguesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.