Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Hubbard

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided December 17, 1971No. 24,119Published

1DissentDarden, Chief Judge

I had understood recent cases to support the principle that Article 10, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 810, violations are to be tested for prejudice. The Court did this in United States v Parish, 17 USCMA 411, 38 CMR 209 (1968); in United States v Hawes, 18 USCMA 464, 40 CMR 176 (1969); in United States v Keaton, 18 USCMA 500, 40 CMR 212 (1969); in United States v Przybycien, 19 USCMA 120, 41 CMR 120 (1969); in United States v Pierce, 19 USCMA 225, 41 CMR 225 (1970); in United States v Mladjen, 19 USCMA 159, 41 CMR 159 (1969); and in United States v Marin, 20 USCMA 432, 43 CMR…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. ParishUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968
  2. United States v. MladjenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  3. United States v. KeatonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  4. United States v. PierceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
  5. United States v. HawesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API