Legal Opinion

Sea Carriers Corp. v. EMPIRE PROGRAMS INC.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 15, 2007No. 04 CIV. 7395(RWS)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Defendants Empire Programs, Inc. (“Empire”) and Robert A. Martin (“Martin”) (referred to collectively as the “Defendants”) have moved pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P., for summary judgment dismissing the Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff Sea Carriers Corporation (“Sea Carriers” or “Plaintiff’) in its entirety. For the reasons set forth below, the motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part.

The Parties

Sea Carriers, a Delaware corporation, was founded by Per G. Barre (“Barre”). Sea Carriers has its principal place of business in Connecticut.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  5. Western World Insurance Company v. Stack Oil, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kermanshah v. KermanshahDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  2. MBIA Insurance v. Patriarch Partners VIII, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  3. Girdwood Mining Company v. Comsult LLCAlaska Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API